Global Access to Safe Water: Accounting for Water Quality and the Resulting Impact on MDG Progress

March 14, 2012 · 1 comment

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health March 2012, 9(3), 880-894; doi:10.3390/ijerph9030880

Global Access to Safe Water: Accounting for Water Quality and the Resulting Impact on MDG Progress

Kyle Onda , Joe LoBuglio and Jamie Bartram. The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

Monitoring of progress towards the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) drinking water target relies on classification of water sources as “improved” or “unimproved” as an indicator for water safety. We adjust the current Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) estimate by accounting for microbial water quality and sanitary risk using the only-nationally representative water quality data currently available, that from the WHO and UNICEF “Rapid Assessment of Drinking Water Quality”.

A principal components analysis (PCA) of national environmental and development indicators was used to create models that predicted, for most countries, the proportions of piped and of other-improved water supplies that are faecally contaminated; and of these sources, the proportions that lack basic sanitary protection against contamination. We estimate that 1.8 billion people (28% of the global population) used unsafe water in 2010.

The 2010 JMP estimate is that 783 million people (11%) use unimproved sources. Our estimates revise the 1990 baseline from 23% to 37%, and the target from 12% to 18%, resulting in a shortfall of 10% of the global population towards the MDG target in 2010. In contrast, using the indicator “use of an improved source” suggests that the MDG target for drinking-water has already been achieved.

We estimate that an additional 1.2 billion (18%) use water from sources or systems with significant sanitary risks. While our estimate is imprecise, the magnitude of the estimate and the health and development implications suggest that greater attention is needed to better understand and manage drinking water safety.

Bookmark and Share

Leave a Comment

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Edi Putra March 16, 2012 at 10:34 am

use of pure water, from our experience proved quite healthy society.
production is more expensive than mineral water.
however, good for children, in addition to liquid milk.
stale milk and quick no lust child up for consumption.
for adults, can improve the body’s metabolism, and can reduce levels of illness and to heal, such as kidney, uric acid, gastric acid and diabetes.
because we’ve already proven market for 4 years.
and this reduce the cost of medicine, because it is rarely sick ..


Previous post:

Next post: